Mehdi Dogguy:
> I wonder if I'm not just going to drop jline from scala'a package and
> rely on readline-editor instead (by using "rlwrap -C scala"). That would
> help us to not care about their fork of jline. (or I could build jline
> from src/jline). Inputs on this matter are welcome.
I think it
On 12/14/2011 04:42 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 04:36 PM, Thomas Koch wrote:
>>
>> scala installs upstream's lib/jline.jar instead of relying on
>> Debian's jline package. lib/jline.jar even contains a shared
>> library (META-INF/native/linux32/libjansi.so).
>>
>
> Yeah… the sad th
On 12/14/2011 04:36 PM, Thomas Koch wrote:
>
> scala installs upstream's lib/jline.jar instead of relying on
> Debian's jline package. lib/jline.jar even contains a shared
> library (META-INF/native/linux32/libjansi.so).
>
Yeah… the sad thing is that the two are incompatible (Debian's jline.ja
Package: scala
Version: 2.9.1.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
scala installs upstream's lib/jline.jar instead of relying on Debian's jline
package. lib/jline.jar even contains a shared library
(META-INF/native/linux32/libjansi.so).
Regards,
Thomas K
4 matches
Mail list logo
