Mehdi Dogguy: > I wonder if I'm not just going to drop jline from scala'a package and > rely on readline-editor instead (by using "rlwrap -C scala"). That would > help us to not care about their fork of jline. (or I could build jline > from src/jline). Inputs on this matter are welcome. I think it is unacceptable for a package in main to just copy a .jar from upstream. Is there an entry in scala's issue tracker asking them to revert to an unpatched jline? Could you fill one and another Debian bug tracking this?
Regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
