Bug#650144: encfs

2011-12-11 Thread Francesco Namuri
Il giorno ven, 09/12/2011 alle 16.41 +0100, Robert Millan ha scritto: > Hi, > > 2011/11/29 Francesco Namuri : > > Yes, of course, but I prefer to wait the testing transition of > > crytpkeeper. I lower the severity to important. > > It has migrated now. > Hi Robert, uploaded right now. ciao, f

Bug#650144: encfs

2011-12-09 Thread Robert Millan
Hi, 2011/11/29 Francesco Namuri : > Yes, of course, but I prefer to wait the testing transition of > crytpkeeper. I lower the severity to important. It has migrated now. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Bug#650144: encfs

2011-11-29 Thread Robert Millan
2011/11/29 Francesco Namuri : > Hi Robert, > thanks for the information, I saw the report before the upload, but, > considering that there had been no response from July, I prefered to do > the upload temporarily without the  kfreeBSD architecture. > >[...] I prefer to wait the testing transition o

Bug#650144: encfs

2011-11-29 Thread Francesco Namuri
severity 650144 normal thanks Sorry, confused the severity of the bug. francesco On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:56:23AM +, Francesco Namuri wrote: > severity 650144 important > thanks > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:59:58AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > found 650144 0.9.5-3 > > thanks > > > >

Bug#650144: encfs

2011-11-29 Thread Francesco Namuri
severity 650144 important thanks On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:59:58AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > found 650144 0.9.5-3 > thanks > > Hi, > > encfs is "almost" available on GNU/kFreeBSD. It has had a patch since > July, see #634217. I've uploaded an NMU to fix this now (to > DELAYED/5). Hi Robe