severity 650144 normal thanks Sorry, confused the severity of the bug.
francesco On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:56:23AM +0000, Francesco Namuri wrote: > severity 650144 important > thanks > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:59:58AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > found 650144 0.9.5-3 > > thanks > > > > Hi, > > > > encfs is "almost" available on GNU/kFreeBSD. It has had a patch since > > July, see #634217. I've uploaded an NMU to fix this now (to > > DELAYED/5). > > Hi Robert, > thanks for the information, I saw the report before the upload, but, > considering that there had been no response from July, I prefered to do > the upload temporarily without the kfreeBSD architecture. > > > So please add "kfreebsd-any" to architecture list of cryptkeeper, it > > will be buildable inmediately (as it was before) and installable once > > encfs binaries for kfreebsd-* reach unstable. > > Yes, of course, but I prefer to wait the testing transition of > crytpkeeper. I lower the severity to important. > > Thank you, > francesco > > > -- > > Robert Millan > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org