severity 650144 normal
thanks

Sorry,
confused the severity of the bug.

francesco

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:56:23AM +0000, Francesco Namuri wrote:
> severity 650144 important
> thanks
> 
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:59:58AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > found 650144 0.9.5-3
> > thanks
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > encfs is "almost" available on GNU/kFreeBSD.  It has had a patch since
> > July, see #634217.  I've uploaded an NMU to fix this now (to
> > DELAYED/5).
> 
> Hi Robert,
> thanks for the information, I saw the report before the upload, but,
> considering that there had been no response from July, I prefered to do
> the upload temporarily without the  kfreeBSD architecture.
> 
> > So please add "kfreebsd-any" to architecture list of cryptkeeper, it
> > will be buildable inmediately (as it was before) and installable once
> > encfs binaries for kfreebsd-* reach unstable.
> 
> Yes, of course, but I prefer to wait the testing transition of
> crytpkeeper. I lower the severity to important.
> 
> Thank you,
> francesco
> 
> > -- 
> > Robert Millan
> 
> 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to