Bug#645290: FTBFS in testing, but not in unstable

2012-03-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-03-20 at 09:22pm, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-03-20 at 08:33pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > OK, the problem is having libldap2-dev installed but not libacl1-dev. > > Because of that, configure sets HAVE_LDAP to yes but HAVE_ACLS to > > undefined, this causes ldap.c to be built, but > >

Bug#645290: FTBFS in testing, but not in unstable

2012-03-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2012-03-20 at 21:22 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Seems this is _not_ an underlying problem of libldap2-dev needing a > dependency on libacl1-dev, but _is_ one of netatalk upstream either > needing tightening of requirement resolving in configure script or > untangling in its code str

Bug#645290: FTBFS in testing, but not in unstable

2012-03-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-03-20 at 08:33pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > OK, the problem is having libldap2-dev installed but not libacl1-dev. > Because of that, configure sets HAVE_LDAP to yes but HAVE_ACLS to > undefined, this causes ldap.c to be built, but > ./include/atalk/ldapconfig.h defines nothing, and hence s

Bug#645290: FTBFS in testing, but not in unstable

2012-03-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
OK, the problem is having libldap2-dev installed but not libacl1-dev. Because of that, configure sets HAVE_LDAP to yes but HAVE_ACLS to undefined, this causes ldap.c to be built, but ./include/atalk/ldapconfig.h defines nothing, and hence struct ldap_pref and struct pref_array are undefined, leadin

Bug#645290: FTBFS in testing, but not in unstable

2012-03-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
package netatalk tags 645290 unreproducible thanks On 12-03-19 at 08:57pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2011-10-14 at 11:55 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > When I build this package in testing, I get this: > > > > > > ... > > > gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include

Bug#645290: FTBFS in testing, but not in unstable

2012-03-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On fre, 2011-10-14 at 11:55 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > When I build this package in testing, I get this: > > > > ... > > gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include > > "-D_U_=__attribute__((unused))" -g -O2 -fstack-protector > > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURC

Bug#645290: FTBFS in testing, but not in unstable

2011-10-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Peter, On 11-10-14 at 06:43am, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Package: netatalk > Version: 2.2~beta4-1 > Severity: important > > When I build this package in testing, I get this: > > ... > gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include > "-D_U_=__attribute__((unused))" -g -O2 -fstack

Bug#645290: FTBFS in testing, but not in unstable

2011-10-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Package: netatalk Version: 2.2~beta4-1 Severity: important When I build this package in testing, I get this: ... gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include "-D_U_=__attribute__((unused))" -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Wformat-s