On tis, 2012-03-20 at 21:22 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Seems this is _not_ an underlying problem of libldap2-dev needing a > dependency on libacl1-dev, but _is_ one of netatalk upstream either > needing tightening of requirement resolving in configure script or > untangling in its code structures.
It appears to be that way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
