Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-04-15 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim., 2012-04-15 at 20:32 +0200, Carsten Hey wrote: > * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-04-15 09:18 +0200]: > > On ven., 2012-03-23 at 23:39 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: […] Ok, I give up. -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-04-15 Thread Carsten Hey
* Carsten Hey [2012-04-15 20:32 +0200]: > #=== > # Waf-Data-Format: 1.0 # Waf-Version: 1.8 > # Waf-Archive-Type: tar.gz > # Waf-Archive-Base-Directory: wafadmin > # Waf-Line-Feed-Replacement: ab > # Waf-Carriage-Return-Replacement: xy > #==> > #... > #<== -- To UNSUBSCRI

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-04-15 Thread Carsten Hey
* Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-04-15 09:18 +0200]: > On ven., 2012-03-23 at 23:39 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > > I think we should drop ftpmaster from CC in further mails. > > Maybe, since they don't seem to care about this. They provided an IMHO acceptable, but not ideal, way (because there there does

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-04-15 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2012-03-23 at 23:39 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > I think we should drop ftpmaster from CC in further mails. Maybe, since they don't seem to care about this. But considering they decided to forbid waf, I think they should at least pay attention on how people is trying to cope with their (im

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-23 Thread Carsten Hey
* Carsten Hey [2012-03-23 23:39 +0100]: > Having an easy command to unpack and repack waf scripts > would have been great, but this is not possible unless we would adapt > the values of C1 and C2 in the waf script (and thus parsing python), > which would lead to an ugly hack. Alternatively, a temp

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-23 Thread Carsten Hey
I think we should drop ftpmaster from CC in further mails. * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-17 09:36 +0100]: > On sam., 2012-03-17 at 02:45 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > > waf scripts are not cleanly divided into python and data, but instead > > the python part contains also two two byte sequences (foun

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-17 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2012-03-17 at 02:45 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > waf scripts are not cleanly divided into python and data, but instead > the python part contains also two two byte sequences (found using brute > force whilst building the waf script). My original plan was to ship two > scripts debian/waf-un

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-16 Thread Carsten Hey
waf scripts are not cleanly divided into python and data, but instead the python part contains also two two byte sequences (found using brute force whilst building the waf script). My original plan was to ship two scripts debian/waf-unpack and debian/waf-repack to provide an easy way to edit the w

Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-15 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On jeu., 2012-03-15 at 20:32 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/midori.git;a=commitdiff;h=23b89cca6b96266eea166b30ac8d1591ffbf7b2f > > I don't assume this diff would make ftpmaster entirely happy. I'll send > a NMU diff against midori/sid that adapts th

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-15 Thread Carsten Hey
* Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-15 11:11 +0100]: > On sam., 2012-03-10 at 20:24 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On sam., 2012-03-10 at 19:12 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > > > * Carsten Hey [2012-03-10 18:43 +0100]: > > > Actually I was not using a waf command but instead well known tools > > > insta

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-15 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2012-03-10 at 20:24 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On sam., 2012-03-10 at 19:12 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > > * Carsten Hey [2012-03-10 18:43 +0100]: > > > * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-10 16:30 +0100]: > > > > I have to admit I'm not exactly sure what your point is. From where does > >

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-10 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2012-03-10 at 19:12 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > * Carsten Hey [2012-03-10 18:43 +0100]: > > * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-10 16:30 +0100]: > > > I have to admit I'm not exactly sure what your point is. From where does > > > the waf command you're using come from? > > > > ... > > Actually I

Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-10 Thread Carsten Hey
* Carsten Hey [2012-03-10 18:43 +0100]: > * Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-10 16:30 +0100]: > > I have to admit I'm not exactly sure what your point is. From where does > > the waf command you're using come from? > > ... Actually I was not using a waf command but instead well known tools installed on

Bug#654468: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-10 Thread Carsten Hey
* Yves-Alexis Perez [2012-03-10 16:30 +0100]: > On ven., 2012-03-09 at 21:42 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > > [ I'm sending this to the two bugs Rhonda sent the mail I reply to and > > an additional bug tagged wontfix to avoid spamming all affected bugs ] > > Can't this be helpful to others? If any

Bug#645190: Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2012-03-10 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2012-03-09 at 21:42 +0100, Carsten Hey wrote: > [ I'm sending this to the two bugs Rhonda sent the mail I reply to and > an additional bug tagged wontfix to avoid spamming all affected bugs ] Can't this be helpful to others? > > * Gerfried Fuchs [2011-10-13 15:12 +0200]: > > it seems

Bug#645191: update on waf binary data

2011-10-13 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi again, * Yves-Alexis Perez [2011-10-13 20:59:43 CEST]: > On jeu., 2011-10-13 at 15:12 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > it seems that the line 161 is actually a tar.bz2 file that gets > > extracted and then used. Though, first there is some substitution of \r > > and \n characters so that