On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:24:23AM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just tried the version from Squeeze (1.41.12-4stable1), and it does
> work properly
Yes, that's not surprising. The 1.41 version doesn't try to use the
new-style resize2fs ioctl. The fundamental issue is what er
Hello,
I have just tried the version from Squeeze (1.41.12-4stable1), and it does work
properly:
# resize2fs /dev/sda2
resize2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
Filesystem at /dev/sda2 is mounted on /; on-line resizing required
old desc_blocks = 1, new_desc_blocks = 1
Performing an on-line resize of /dev/
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:38:18 -0500
Ted Ts'o wrote:
> Are you using a 32-bit or 64-bit userspace with this 64-bit kernel?
> Because I can't replicate the problem, and in fact everyone else was
> complaining when we were checking for EINVAL instead of ENOTTY (which
> is what should be returned).
H
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 02:29:37AM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> reopen 644989 !
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> With e2fsprogs 1.42~WIP-2011-10-16-1 and
>
> Linux hoshi 3.1.0-libre-lemote-rm2-mfgpt #2 Fri Nov 11 03:07:23 YEKT 2011
> mips64 GNU/Linux
>
Are you using a 32-bit or 64-bit userspace with
reopen 644989 !
thanks
Hello,
With e2fsprogs 1.42~WIP-2011-10-16-1 and
Linux hoshi 3.1.0-libre-lemote-rm2-mfgpt #2 Fri Nov 11 03:07:23 YEKT 2011
mips64 GNU/Linux
This bug still happens:
# resize2fs /dev/sda2
resize2fs 1.42-WIP (16-Oct-2011)
Filesystem at /dev/sda2 is mounted on /; on-line res
5 matches
Mail list logo