> What I believe Adam is requesting is an alternative to installing
> Apache for RT; the current dependencies go
>
> request-tracker4 -> rt4-apache2 -> apache2
Yes, more or less. I'd like to see request-tracker4 depend on
"rt4-webserver", where rt4-webserver is a virtual package provided by
eithe
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 01:10:08PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:52:21PM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
> > > 1) rt4-starman, instead of rt4-apache2. Or even nginx or lighttpd, but
> > >
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 01:10:08PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:52:21PM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
> > > 1) rt4-starman, instead of rt4-apache2. Or even nginx or lighttpd, but
> > >
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:34:18PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:52:21PM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
> > 1) rt4-starman, instead of rt4-apache2. Or even nginx or lighttpd, but
> > Apache + mod_perl is a much heavier solution than I'd like on a dedicated
>
Source: request-tracker4
Severity: wishlist
Version: 4.0.2-1
X-Debbugs-Cc: athom...@athompso.net
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 03:52:21PM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
> 1) rt4-starman, instead of rt4-apache2. Or even nginx or lighttpd, but
> Apache + mod_perl is a much heavier solution than I'd like on
5 matches
Mail list logo