Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-05 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 07:43:03AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 04/09/11 at 16:25 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: > > Hi Francesco, > > > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > > > > I've uploaded a new version of dpkg-ruby, so libdpkg-ruby1.8 can > > > > be re

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/09/11 at 16:25 -0700, Ryan Niebur wrote: > Hi Francesco, > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > > I've uploaded a new version of dpkg-ruby, so libdpkg-ruby1.8 can > > > be replaced by dpkg-ruby (>= 3.7.7). > > > > Hi Ryan! > > > > Shouldn't it be rub

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi Francesco, On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > I've uploaded a new version of dpkg-ruby, so libdpkg-ruby1.8 can > > be replaced by dpkg-ruby (>= 3.7.7). > > Hi Ryan! > > Shouldn't it be ruby-dpkg, rather than dpkg-ruby, according to the new > Ruby Debian p

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 14:24:31 -0700 Ryan Niebur wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:35:04AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > Package: apt-listbugs > > Version: 0.1.5 > > Severity: important > > > > Dear Maintainers, > > > > I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages. >

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:35:04AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > Package: apt-listbugs > Version: 0.1.5 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainers, > > I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages. > Please consider to correct these and to replace them by the correct d

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 08:16:48 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 04/09/11 at 00:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Good, if what I discovered doesn't change the conclusion, I'll keep the > > versioned dependency. > > Please do. OK, thanks for confirming that it is recommendable. > > If you

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:17:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 04.09.11 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net) wrote: [...] > > If you want to facilitate backports, maybe use something like: > > ruby-cmdparse2 (>= X) | libcmdparse2-ruby (>= X) > > > I don't think that backporting apt-listbugs to

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-04 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 04.09.11 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net) wrote: > On 04/09/11 at 00:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: Hi, > > Good, if what I discovered doesn't change the conclusion, I'll > > keep the versioned dependency. > > Please do. > > If you want to facilitate backports, maybe use something

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/09/11 at 00:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:32:19 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > [...] > > Hi, > > Hi Lucas, thanks a lot for your kind reply! > > > > > Do you know why those versioned deps were introduced? > > Well, actually, after digging into the git repositor

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-03 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 22:32:19 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [...] > Hi, Hi Lucas, thanks a lot for your kind reply! > > Do you know why those versioned deps were introduced? Well, actually, after digging into the git repository, I remembered that the versioned dependency was introduced by me for a

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 02/09/11 at 19:24 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:31:24 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > > On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote: > > > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (>= 2.

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-02 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:31:24 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > Hi, > > > > dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (>= 2.1.5.2-1) > > > Transitional package for ruby-httpclient > > >

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-02 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote: > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, > > dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (>= 2.1.5.2-1) > > Transitional package for ruby-httpclient > > also a virtual package provided by ruby-httpclient > > Should I keep

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-01 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > Package: apt-listbugs > Version: 0.1.5 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainers, > > I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages. > Please consider to correct these and to replace them by the correct depends

Bug#639972: apt-listbugs: Depends on a few of transitional packages

2011-09-01 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.5 Severity: important Dear Maintainers, I just noticed that apt-listbugs depends on a few transitional packages. Please consider to correct these and to replace them by the correct depends: dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (>= 2.1.5.2-1) Transitional package for