On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:31:24 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote: > > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > Hi, > > > > dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (>= 2.1.5.2-1) > > > Transitional package for ruby-httpclient > > > also a virtual package provided by ruby-httpclient > > > > Should I keep the version constraint in the dependency, as in: > > > > Depends: [...] ruby-httpclient (>= 2.1.5.2-1) > > > > in order to give useful hints to people who could wish to backport > > future versions of apt-listbugs to squeeze (or earlier Debian versions)? > > > > Or should I just depend on an unversioned ruby-httpclient? > > > I'm sorry, I can't really help here. I suggest to contact the authors > of the packages.
Lucas, could you please advice? You may find more context at http://bugs.debian.org/639972 Thanks for your time. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgphDrpQyzGC0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
