On May 22, 2013, at 03:21 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>I can try to package the first one (hotkeys), but probably I won't
>have time for it until next week.
That would be great. I personally have no interest or time to package
JavaScript stuff, and I definitely don't want to be a maintainer for a
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 21-May-2013, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On May 21, 2013, at 01:30 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> >Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> >> Can't we get coverage 3.6 into Debian, with enabled Python 3 support now?
>> >
>> >If you can see a way to do it without adding
On 21-May-2013, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 21, 2013, at 01:30 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> >Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >> Can't we get coverage 3.6 into Debian, with enabled Python 3 support now?
> >
> >If you can see a way to do it without adding those libraries in the
> >package, sure. I think it would n
On May 21, 2013, at 01:30 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> I'm confused though because if those block bug packages aren't packaged for
>> Debian yet (they're wnpp), then how can they be duplicated library code?
>
>Duplicated in other packages. (e.g. ‘jquery.hotkeys.js’ is in Debian's
>‘wordpress’, ‘spotwe
On 20-May-2013, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Hi Ben […]
>
> > Upstream version 3.5 introduces yet more duplicated library code that
> > is currently not packaged properly for Debian, so upstream version 3.5
> > cannot be packaged yet.
>
> I'm confused though because if those block bug packages aren't pa
5 matches
Mail list logo
