On 21-May-2013, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On May 21, 2013, at 01:30 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > >Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> Can't we get coverage 3.6 into Debian, with enabled Python 3 support now? > > > >If you can see a way to do it without adding those libraries in the > >package, sure. I think it would not be worthwhile to bundle them with > >‘python-coverage’. > > I don't personally use any of the html stuff in coverage, so for me, if it's > just a degradation in the html output, I won't care. Others might, but I'll > let them fix the JavaScript packaging issues.
That's not a solution for Debian, then. The Debian package will need to wait for a way that works for Debian; and for now, I see the most likely option is to get those who want this in Debian to motivate someone skilled to package the third-party libraries needed. -- \ “I was in the grocery store. I saw a sign that said ‘pet | `\ supplies’. So I did. Then I went outside and saw a sign that | _o__) said ‘compact cars’.” —Steven Wright | Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
