Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-20 Thread David Kuehling
> "Neil" == Neil Williams writes: >> A version mismatch will occur exacty when a mirror update ocurred in >> between the download of sources.bz2 and packages.bz2. You want to >> tell me that this is not possible, however your description of the >> process makes it look like it is possible, t

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-17 Thread David Kuehling
> "Neil" == Neil Williams writes: > Could you have a look at the current SVN revision and let me know how > that matches your tests? I just tested with r8024 and it now seems to correctly retrieve all source packages (i.e. the files in the retainsources directory now pass the debparanoia lic

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:22:21 +0200 David Kuehling wrote: > > "Neil" == Neil Williams writes: > > Thought I'd just point out where my paranoia about proper source version > matching comes from: > > * we're using architecture powerpcspe from debian-ports. debian-ports >doesn't carry so

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-16 Thread David Kuehling
> "Neil" == Neil Williams writes: Thought I'd just point out where my paranoia about proper source version matching comes from: * we're using architecture powerpcspe from debian-ports. debian-ports doesn't carry sources, and is out of sync with normal debian mirrors, which makes it p

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-16 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:22:25 +0200 David Kuehling wrote: > >> That's exactly the problem: inconsistent versions in the archive or > >> archive updates while multistrap runs. > > > That sounds like a broken archive. > > > I haven't implemented the versioned source call - I remain unconvinced > >

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-15 Thread David Kuehling
> "Neil" == Neil Williams writes: > Error handling is the main reason. Unpacking might fail, the archives > might be the only source of data. > Could you have a look at the current SVN revision and let me know how > that matches your tests? I'm going to have a look at it and test this stuff

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-15 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:49:50 +0200 David Kuehling wrote: > > Neil Williams writes: > > On Wed, 18 May 2011 15:09:44 +0200 > > David Kuehling wrote: > > > Think about this more carefully. The situation is that multistrap is > > stateless and something can have happened which means that the run

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-15 Thread David Kuehling
> "Neil" == Neil Williams writes: > On Wed, 18 May 2011 15:09:44 +0200 > David Kuehling wrote: > the attached patch (mostly) fixes bug #627179 [1]. Patch is against >> multistrap SVN head [2]. > The patch looks interesting but incomplete and possibly misleading. I understand that it's in

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-06-11 Thread Neil Williams
tag 627179 + moreinfo tag 627179 - patch quit On Wed, 18 May 2011 15:09:44 +0200 David Kuehling wrote: > the attached patch (mostly) fixes bug #627179 [1]. Patch is against > multistrap SVN head [2]. The patch looks interesting but incomplete and possibly misleading. > The patch misses one o

Bug#627179: multistrap: Using retainsources=dir does not retain some sources

2011-05-18 Thread David Kuehling
Package: multistrap Severity: normal looks like multistrap 2.1.13 (from svn) is incapable of downloading source for some packages. For example source-code for bash is missing when used with Ubuntu Lucid repositories. The problem seems to be caused by multistrap querying the 'Source' field of th