Bug#625901: gcc-mingw-w64: gcc 4.6 supports the LTO plugin with binutils 2.21

2011-05-21 Thread Török Edwin
On 05/22/2011 12:46 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Hi again, > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:16:37PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: >> It turns out I was wrong - gcc does support the LTO plugin with >> "classic" ld, as long as it's gcc 4.6 and binutils 2.21. I'm working >> on a gcc-4.6-based version of this

Bug#625901: gcc-mingw-w64: gcc 4.6 supports the LTO plugin with binutils 2.21

2011-05-21 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi again, On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:16:37PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > It turns out I was wrong - gcc does support the LTO plugin with > "classic" ld, as long as it's gcc 4.6 and binutils 2.21. I'm working > on a gcc-4.6-based version of this package, I'll make sure it provides > the LTO plugin

Bug#625901: gcc-mingw-w64: gcc 4.6 supports the LTO plugin with binutils 2.21

2011-05-20 Thread Stephen Kitt
reopen 625901 tag 625901 -wontfix thanks Hi Török, It turns out I was wrong - gcc does support the LTO plugin with "classic" ld, as long as it's gcc 4.6 and binutils 2.21. I'm working on a gcc-4.6-based version of this package, I'll make sure it provides the LTO plugin as well (and depends on an