On 05/22/2011 12:46 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Hi again, > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:16:37PM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: >> It turns out I was wrong - gcc does support the LTO plugin with >> "classic" ld, as long as it's gcc 4.6 and binutils 2.21. I'm working >> on a gcc-4.6-based version of this package, I'll make sure it provides >> the LTO plugin as well (and depends on an appropriate version of >> binutils-mingw-w64). > > There's yet another problem: with the LTO plugin, ld 2.21 > segfaults... This is fixed in 2.22, so this will only work correctly > when binutils 2.22 is available (and binutils-mingw-w64 is rebuilt > using 2.22). See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12693 > for details. >
Thanks, lets wait for 2.22 then with LTO. --Edwin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
