On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 11:29 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> cpufreqd is in a relatively bad shape, unfortunately I haven't been able
> take care of it as I should have in quite some time.
> One bug seems particularly bad (severity is important at the moment):
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Mattia Dongili writes:
> On running lintian against the package though there one particular error
> that I'm wondering if I should fix:
> E: cpufreqd: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file
> usr/lib/cpufreqd/cpufreqd_acpi.la
> E: cpufreqd: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file
> usr/lib/cpufreqd/
Hi Release Managers,
cpufreqd is in a relatively bad shape, unfortunately I haven't been able
take care of it as I should have in quite some time.
One bug seems particularly bad (severity is important at the moment):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619913
The patch is simple, the
3 matches
Mail list logo
