Mattia Dongili <malat...@linux.it> writes: > On running lintian against the package though there one particular error > that I'm wondering if I should fix: > E: cpufreqd: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file > usr/lib/cpufreqd/cpufreqd_acpi.la > E: cpufreqd: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file > usr/lib/cpufreqd/cpufreqd_exec.la > E: cpufreqd: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file > usr/lib/cpufreqd/cpufreqd_governor_parameters.la > E: cpufreqd: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file > usr/lib/cpufreqd/cpufreqd_sensors.la
> .la files can be removed in cpufreqd, those are all plugins and it's not > going to be any useful to build anything against them. I wouldn't fix this at this point in the release cycle if your other changes are approved. Since these are *.la files for plugins, this is fairly harmless and unlikely to cause issues. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
