On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:07:08 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:39:05 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
>
> > Ok, in this case the patch, proposed here [1] can be applied.
> [...]
> > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618968#40
>
> Yes, I am afraid this is the only s
On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:39:05 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
> Ok, in this case the patch, proposed here [1] can be applied.
[...]
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618968#40
Yes, I am afraid this is the only short-term solution we have for the
time being... :-(
Bye and thanks f
Ok, in this case the patch, proposed here [1] can be applied.
Cheers,
Anton
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618968#40
2013/1/13 Francesco Poli :
> I found out that basically *all* libav binary packages are effectively
> under the GNU GPL v2 or later (some are even under the
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:14:06 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 23:34:51 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
>
> > 2012/11/28 Francesco Poli :
> > > Well, it's a single file with a single copyright holder: I don't know,
> > > maybe Aaron Holtzman may be contacted and persuaded to re-lice
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 23:34:51 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
> 2012/11/28 Francesco Poli :
> > Well, it's a single file with a single copyright holder: I don't know,
> > maybe Aaron Holtzman may be contacted and persuaded to re-license the
> > file under the terms of the GNU
2012/11/28 Francesco Poli :
> Well, it's a single file with a single copyright holder: I don't know,
> maybe Aaron Holtzman may be contacted and persuaded to re-license the
> file under the terms of the GNU LGPL v2.1 ...
It seems, the file libavcodec/x86/idct_mmx.c is obsolete and dropped by
upstr
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 21:48:20 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
> 2012/11/28 Francesco Poli :
> > libav-0.8.4/libavcodec/x86/idct_mmx.c
> > which is licensed under the GNU GPL v2 or later.
> >
> > Does this file get compiled into a library that is linked with netgen?
>
> Unfortunately yes [1].
I see...
2012/11/28 Francesco Poli :
> libav-0.8.4/libavcodec/x86/idct_mmx.c
> which is licensed under the GNU GPL v2 or later.
>
> Does this file get compiled into a library that is linked with netgen?
Unfortunately yes [1]. It gets compiled into libavcodec.so.53 and possibly
other shared libs.
Anton
[1
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:31:20 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I think this should be reported to the libav Debian package maintainers.
For the record, I've just reported this bug: its number is #694657
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:06:16 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote:
[...]
> Francesco, could you, please, verify, whether the bug can be
> closed?
Hi Anton,
it seems to me that
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/liba/libav/libav_0.8.4-1/libavcodec53.copyright
is no longer consistent with the actu
tags 618968 - patch + moreinfo
thanks
Francesco, could you, please, verify, whether the bug can be
closed?
Thanks,
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 15:59 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> From libswscale/swscale.h:
>
> /*
> * Copyright (C) 2001-2003 Michael Niedermayer
> *
> * This file is part of Libav.
> *
> * Libav is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser Gener
>From libswscale/swscale.h:
/*
* Copyright (C) 2001-2003 Michael Niedermayer
*
* This file is part of Libav.
*
* Libav is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; eithe
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 15:25 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Well, there is a list of files in libav, which are also under
> GPL-license [1]. I do not know, whether those files are used
> for building.
>
> Anton
>
> [1]
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/liba/libav/current/copyright
>
Well, there is a list of files in libav, which are also under
GPL-license [1]. I do not know, whether those files are used
for building.
Anton
[1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/liba/libav/current/copyright
2012/11/27 trophime :
> libav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 15:10 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> sorry, I don't get your point regarding these packages. The patch
> completely removes ffmpeg from netgen, so the license issue can
> be "solved" in this case.
netgen does not use ffmpeg as such. It uses libav libraries!
Hi Christophe,
sorry, I don't get your point regarding these packages. The patch
completely removes ffmpeg from netgen, so the license issue can
be "solved" in this case.
Thanks,
Anton
2012/11/27 trophime :
> Hi,
> unless I'm wrong netgen requires the following package to have "ffmpeg"
> featu
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 11:45 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> tags 618968 +patch
> thanks
>
> Please, consider the following patch, which prevents of
> using ffmpeg in netgen build. It will, of course, cut the functionality
> of netgen, but will let to stay it in wheezy.
>
> The upload should be done
tags 618968 +patch
thanks
Please, consider the following patch, which prevents of
using ffmpeg in netgen build. It will, of course, cut the functionality
of netgen, but will let to stay it in wheezy.
The upload should be done directly to wheezy, because
sid contains the version, which will unlike
19 matches
Mail list logo
