Bug#606960: Unclear documentation in /etc/jackrc

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Banck
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:35:24PM +, Reuben Thomas wrote: > On 13 December 2010 21:36, Michael Banck wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:35:46AM +, Reuben Thomas wrote: > >> Further, twolame is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for lame, so > >> why is there no mention of that? >

Bug#606960: Unclear documentation in /etc/jackrc

2010-12-13 Thread Reuben Thomas
On 13 December 2010 21:36, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:35:46AM +, Reuben Thomas wrote: >> Further, twolame is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for lame, so >> why is there no mention of that? > > I was under the impression that twolame encodes to > mp2 format, not m

Bug#606960: Unclear documentation in /etc/jackrc

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, thanks for the patch, will look at it. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:35:46AM +, Reuben Thomas wrote: > Further, twolame is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for lame, so > why is there no mention of that? I was under the impression that twolame encodes to mp2 format, not mp3. Can you poi

Bug#606960: Unclear documentation in /etc/jackrc

2010-12-13 Thread Reuben Thomas
Package: jack Version: 3.1.1+cvs20050801-26 Severity: minor Tags: patch One typo: “avaiable” -> “available” One clause ends prematurely: “...’gogo’, ‘mp3enc’ or (only oggenc and flac...)”. There should be something between the “or” and the “(“. When it says that things are/are not available in D