tags 600872 + wontfix
severity 600872 normal
thanks
Hi Craig and Cyril,
On 19/11/12 07:39 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> That makes sense. I'll file against libnss-ldap, ldapscripts, and
> libpam-ldap, then; nss-ldap and pam-ldap for adding newlines to their
> secret files, and ldapscripts because it
On 11/20/2012 11:09 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> But this isn't something that can be fixed in the openldap package (apart
> from changing ldapsearch -y, and I think it's a bad idea to diverge from
> upstream).
That makes sense. I'll file against libnss-ldap, ldapscripts, and
libpam-ldap, then; nss-
Craig Ringer writes:
> While upstream may be unwilling to accept a patch for this, it'd be
> really helpful if debconf didn't append a newline to the password files
> like /etc/libnss-ldap.secret.
> Right now, debconf generates password files that ldapsearch -y cannot
> accept.
> This breaks th
While upstream may be unwilling to accept a patch for this, it'd be
really helpful if debconf didn't append a newline to the password files
like /etc/libnss-ldap.secret .
Right now, debconf generates password files that ldapsearch -y cannot
accept.
This breaks things like ldapscripts.
--
Craig
4 matches
Mail list logo
