On Sat, 2010 Sep 25 00:41+0200, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> I can only guess in this case. I may be totally wrong. What makes me
> think this way is that it's not that actively maintained upstream and
> can't configure quite a lot of features openbox provides.
That is a fair point. I was trying out open
Hi,
* Daniel Richard G. [2010-09-24 22:58]:
> On Fri, 2010 Sep 24 22:01+0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> >
> > Sorry but I disagree, most users are probably not using this tool.
>
> I would be quite surprised if most users prefer to edit the
> configuration by hand, instead of using a reasonably polishe
On Fri, 2010 Sep 24 22:01+0200, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> Sorry but I disagree, most users are probably not using this tool.
I would be quite surprised if most users prefer to edit the
configuration by hand, instead of using a reasonably polished GUI tool.
That said, if obconf is judged not to be nee
Hi,
* Daniel Richard G. [2010-09-24 20:29]:
> A default installation of openbox includes a root menu with an "ObConf"
> item, which fails to do anything because obconf is not installed,
> because obconf is suggested and not recommended by openbox, so obconf
> doesn't normally get pulled in when th
Package: openbox
Version: 3.4.11.1-1
A default installation of openbox includes a root menu with an "ObConf"
item, which fails to do anything because obconf is not installed,
because obconf is suggested and not recommended by openbox, so obconf
doesn't normally get pulled in when the user installs
5 matches
Mail list logo
