On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:40:44AM -0400, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> I've attached a patch for the build failure. It compiles, but is
> otherwise untested. Would you mind forwarding this to the boost guys for
> review?
I did forward it as a trac ticket: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/465
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:40:44AM -0400, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:36:03 -0500, "Steve M. Robbins"
> wrote:
> > I agree. Unfortunately, when I tried building Boost 1.44 (just
> > uploaded to experimental), it failed to build Boost.MPI. I posted the
> > bui
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:36:03 -0500, "Steve M. Robbins" wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:22:07PM -0400, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
>
> > I very much appreciate that you already compile Boost Python against
> > Python 2.5 and 2.6. Since upstream already also supports Python3, it
> > would be nice
Please note that we are preparing some python3.1 related changes in
experimental (a mail to debian-python mailing list will be sent once all
parts will be ready to test) so maybe it better to wait a little bit
with your upload...
Anyway, even if these changes will not be accepted, please separate
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:22:07PM -0400, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> I very much appreciate that you already compile Boost Python against
> Python 2.5 and 2.6. Since upstream already also supports Python3, it
> would be nice to also compile against whatever the currently supported
> version of Pyt
Package: libboost-python-dev
Version: 1.42.0.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi there,
I very much appreciate that you already compile Boost Python against
Python 2.5 and 2.6. Since upstream already also supports Python3, it
would be nice to also compile against whatever the currently supported
version of P
6 matches
Mail list logo
