Bug#588752: updated implementation

2011-03-18 Thread Guido Günther
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:48:35PM +0100, Sean Finney wrote: > Hi Guido, > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 22:59 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > * I think we can avoid introducing Command.popen by adding ls_tree to the > > Git > > class itself which already has a __git_getoutput class to read the outpu

Bug#588752: updated implementation

2011-03-10 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Sean, On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:48:35PM +0100, Sean Finney wrote: > Hi Guido, > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 22:59 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > * I think we can avoid introducing Command.popen by adding ls_tree to the > > Git > > class itself which already has a __git_getoutput class to read

Bug#588752: updated implementation

2011-03-10 Thread Sean Finney
Hi Guido, On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 22:59 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > * I think we can avoid introducing Command.popen by adding ls_tree to the Git > class itself which already has a __git_getoutput class to read the output of > git commands. okay, done. > * It might make sense to turn GitArch

Bug#588752: updated implementation

2011-03-09 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Sean, Thanks a lot for working on this! On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:10:31PM +0100, Sean Finney wrote: > (re-sending because the bts was eating mail this morning, it seems) > > > Hi everyone, > > Okay, I think I have a working version that no longer uses stash. > Basically it does what I talk

Bug#588752: updated implementation

2011-03-04 Thread Sean Finney
(re-sending because the bts was eating mail this morning, it seems) Hi everyone, Okay, I think I have a working version that no longer uses stash. Basically it does what I talked about a message or two ago (recursive ls-tree + git archive with cwd set to submodule directory). http://git.debian.