Bug#586273: adobe flash download link

2010-09-15 Thread Jan Niehusmann
Hi, I found the 64bit flash plugin at http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html The file http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/flashplayer_square_p1_64bit_linux_091510.tar.gz contains a libflashplayer.so which does work on my amd64 squeeze system. (Tested with a single yo

Bug#586273: flashplugin-nonfree: flash website says it's available now

2010-09-15 Thread Andre Naujoks
Hi. I really can't find the download. I see the link to the labs page, but there is no download. At least none that I can find. It looks like someone at Adobe made a joke/mistake here. nautsch Am 15.09.2010 03:20, schrieb Tyler MacDonald: > Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 1:2.8.1 Severity:

Bug#586273: http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer

2010-09-08 Thread Nigel Horne
After doing the instructions on http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer for Debian 5.0 amd64 it works. But then if you do "deborphan" you're erroneously told that ia32-libs-workaround-499043 and libswfdec-0.8-0 are no longer needed. -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Adjudicator, Band Trainer, Compo

Bug#586273: Hello dear

2010-08-12 Thread Lillian Desmond
Hello dear My name is Lillian Desmond,i wish to ask for your true friendship.I have important reasons to request your interest. Write me here : l_desmo...@yahoo.co.uk Thanks,

Bug#586273: Fix for current flashplayer workaround package script on squeeze, amd64

2010-08-11 Thread oc-spam66
Hello, OK I got it working and avoided the checksum problem. I did not follow the step n°4 in the documentation: http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer#DebianTesting.27Squeeze.27amd64 I did the following: *** Get libflashplayer.so from: http://get.adobe.com/fr/flashplay

Bug#586273: Fix for current flashplayer workaround package script on squeeze, amd64

2010-08-11 Thread oc-spam66
@Georg Gast: It doesn't work for me: sudo dpkg -i flashplugin-nonfree_10.1.53.64.1_amd64.deb (...) 4750K ..100% 9,30M=0,5s 2010-08-11 15:40:00 (9,53 MB/s) - «./install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz» sauvegardé [4907270/4907270] Download done.

Bug#586273: (no subject)

2010-08-06 Thread Alex Goebel
I don't know whether this helps, but I have maril...@debian.org's flashplayer-mozilla 2:10.1.53.64-0.0 installed (from debian-multimedia), which pulls in the 32 bit plugin and nspluginwrapper and a couple of ia32 libs (some of them also from debian-multimedia), and it works quite well in icewea

Bug#586273: Fix for current flashplayer workaround package script on squeeze amd64

2010-07-25 Thread Georg Gast
Hi all, on http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer is desribed how to make an workaround package with the script provided by Bart Martens. The file libnss3-1d_3.12.6-2_i386.deb is no longer hosted on h ttp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/nss/ If you change the line 55 in file http://people.

Bug#586273: fixed native amd64 version has being available for a while now

2010-07-21 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
d'oh -- I am sorry -- I was mislead. indeed no 64bit version yet. Sorry again for the noise. Cheers On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Andre Naujoks wrote: > Hi. > Where exactly do you see a 64 Bit version of the flash player? > I can't find one in the links provided by you. > As far as I know, there is no

Bug#586273: fixed native amd64 version has being available for a while now

2010-07-20 Thread Andre Naujoks
Hi. Where exactly do you see a 64 Bit version of the flash player? I can't find one in the links provided by you. As far as I know, there is no 64 Bit version for any platform at the moment. So, yes, you might be missing something Regards Andre Naujoks Am 20.07.2010 23:02, schrieb Yaroslav Ha

Bug#586273: fixed native amd64 version has being available for a while now

2010-07-20 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Just want to complement that according http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-14.html and http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ version 10.1.53.64 has been available since June 25, 2010, so I guess that would be logical to return support for amd64? or am I missing something? T

Bug#586273: Just a note about useability

2010-07-17 Thread Dominique Brazziel
After the last upgrade in testing to this package. and being totally confused about 'not supported' and what that might mean, I checked out the changelog link to http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer. Still somewhat confused, I thought I'd get around to doing that series of steps for amd64 wh

Bug#586273: flashplugin-nonfree: Note also that 32 bit plugins is not able to work

2010-06-27 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 1:2.8.1 Severity: grave The libssl3.so and other libraries are available under /usr/lib32/xulrunner which is not managed at linking time. The result is that also with a nspluginwrapper installed, the non-free 32bit flash plugin does not work. Feel free to mo

Bug#586273: maybe some words for the workaround could help

2010-06-26 Thread Matthew Moore
On Saturday June 26 2010 4:55:17 pm Thomas Hahn wrote: > I have installed nspluginwrapper and ran > # nspluginwrapper -v -i /home/tom/Downloads/libflashplayer.so > *** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: libssl3.so: cannot open shared object file: > No such file or directory *** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR:

Bug#586273: maybe some words for the workaround could help

2010-06-26 Thread Thomas Hahn
I have installed nspluginwrapper and ran # nspluginwrapper -v -i /home/tom/Downloads/libflashplayer.so *** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: libssl3.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory *** NSPlugin Viewer *** ERROR: libssl3.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or

Bug#586273:

2010-06-24 Thread Daniel Franganillo
Nspluginwrapper could be an option too, a more secure one indeed, but in my experience it fails to render flash on many sites (the gray box thing). Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de

Bug#586273:

2010-06-24 Thread Charles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > Until we find a way to workaround this (thanks to Adobe anyway..., > this issue makes me hate Flash even more) some workarounds have to be > made, and modfiyng 2.8's update-flashplugin is one perfectly valid. > Leaving that vulnerability open is

Bug#586273:

2010-06-24 Thread Daniel Franganillo
Believe it or not, people do use Flash (Whats the web without Youtube, or WorldCup online matches?), and having a useless package is not an option either. Until we find a way to workaround this (thanks to Adobe anyway..., this issue makes me hate Flash even more) some workarounds have to be made,

Bug#586273:

2010-06-23 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2010-06-23 18:33:30 +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote: > I had the same problem with Adobe cutting the 64bit support, for now I > customized this script and it's solving all my problems: > http://foolcontrol.org/debian-amd64-flash-installer.sh Very bad idea. Version 10.0.45.2 has a critical vulnerabili

Bug#586273:

2010-06-23 Thread Adnan Hodzic
I had the same problem with Adobe cutting the 64bit support, for now I customized this script and it's solving all my problems: http://foolcontrol.org/debian-amd64-flash-installer.sh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#586273: Processed: flashplugin-nonfree - nspluginwrapper - failed to initialize plugin-side RPC client connection

2010-06-22 Thread Rob Andrews
On 19-Jun-2010 10:12.04 (BST), Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > block 586273 by 520189 > Bug #586273 [flashplugin-nonfree] flashplugin-nonfree: useless on amd64 > Was blocked by: 499043 508170 > Added bloc

Bug#586273: flashplugin-nonfree: useless on amd64

2010-06-17 Thread brian m. carlson
Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 1:2.8.1 Severity: grave While I am aware that the 64-bit Flash plugin is only available in versions that have security bugs, the flashplugin-nonfree package is now completely useless on amd64. Please either depend on nspluginwrapper and install the 32-bit plu