severity 584617 normal
thanks
On 2010-06-05 09:26 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-06-05 09:00 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> We have done a directfb transition.
>> Most of the packages should have been rebuilt against latest directfb
>> (and depends on libdirectfb-1.2.9).
>>
>> Do you have so
On 2010-06-05 09:00 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>> This is a problem of libdirectfb-1.2.9 which ought not to conflict with
>> libdirectfb-1.2-0.
>
> wrong, libdirectfb-1.2.9 should conflict against libdirectfb-1.2-0.
> There's conflicting files on armel architecture.
Did you look at the file confl
> This is a problem of libdirectfb-1.2.9 which ought not to conflict with
> libdirectfb-1.2-0.
wrong, libdirectfb-1.2.9 should conflict against libdirectfb-1.2-0.
There's conflicting files on armel architecture.
We have done a directfb transition.
Most of the packages should have been rebuilt aga
On 2010-06-05 07:32 +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> Package: mplayer
> Version: 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-3
> Severity: critical
>
>
> This is what happens, when I try to install that latest version of mplayer:
>
> mplayer version 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-3 depends on libdirectfb-1.2-9.
> Then that pa
Package: mplayer
Version: 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-3
Severity: critical
This is what happens, when I try to install that latest version of mplayer:
mplayer version 2:1.0~rc3+svn20100502-3 depends on libdirectfb-1.2-9.
Then that package called libdirectfb-1.2-9 conflicts with
libdirectfb-1.2-0 . Wh
5 matches
Mail list logo
