On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 04:30:53PM -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote:
>
> Given upstream seem quite keen on being as compliant as possible, I
> suggest we should do this upstream, this seems like a rather big
> behavior divergence for just Debian?
>
> I'd be happier us doing it if upstream is planning t
2010/4/29 micah anderson :
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:00:03 +0200, Joerg Herzinger
> wrote:
>> Package: puppet
>> Version: 0.24.8-2ubuntu4
>> Severity: normal
>> Tags: patch
>>
>> Im running a small company (60 clients, 15 Servers and VMs) all managed by
>> puppet. My clients are Ubuntu, my Server
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:00:03 +0200, Joerg Herzinger
wrote:
> Package: puppet
> Version: 0.24.8-2ubuntu4
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Im running a small company (60 clients, 15 Servers and VMs) all managed by
> puppet. My clients are Ubuntu, my Servers mostly lenny, some squeeze. From
>
Joerg Herzinger writes:
> Im running a small company (60 clients, 15 Servers and VMs) all managed
> by puppet. My clients are Ubuntu, my Servers mostly lenny, some
> squeeze. From time to time I find that the lock file isn't removed after
> a reboot and puppetd doesn't start.
> This happens most
Package: puppet
Version: 0.24.8-2ubuntu4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Im running a small company (60 clients, 15 Servers and VMs) all managed by
puppet. My clients are Ubuntu, my Servers mostly lenny, some squeeze. From time
to time I find that the lock file isn't removed after a reboot and pupp
5 matches
Mail list logo
