On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 04:30:53PM -0700, Nigel Kersten wrote: > > Given upstream seem quite keen on being as compliant as possible, I > suggest we should do this upstream, this seems like a rather big > behavior divergence for just Debian? > > I'd be happier us doing it if upstream is planning to. > > /var/run seems like a much more sane location for this, I don't think > we should break people like Russ who are relying upon this behavior. > > Russ, would you be happy with simply having to override your own > puppetdlockfile location to keep your existing behavior if we/upstream > changed to a location that doesn't persist across reboots? >
If we do go changing this as proposed, something should be added to the NEWS file. I'm sure there's more people than just Russ relying on the current behaviour. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
