It appears that upstream versions 2.4 and later contain all the enhancements
needed.
These include:
o a bug fix for LDL-formatted disks that allows the partition starting
sector and number of sectors to be calculated correctly if the
block size of the disk is something other th
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:44:59 -0400 (EDT), Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>> Your patch is large enough that we have to require
>> a signed copyright assignment.
>>
>> Here's the relevant section from HACKING:
>>
>> http://git.debian.org/?p=parted/parted.git;a=blob;f=HACKING#l428
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:44:59 -0400 (EDT), Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> Your patch is large enough that we have to require
> a signed copyright assignment.
>
> Here's the relevant section from HACKING:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=parted/parted.git;a=blob;f=HACKING#l428
>
> Sorry for the hassle (it
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:44:59 -0400 (EDT), Jim Meyering wrote:
> Your patch is large enough that we have to require
> a signed copyright assignment.
>
> Here's the relevant section from HACKING:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=parted/parted.git;a=blob;f=HACKING#l428
>
> Sorry for the hassle (it'll
Stephen Powell wrote:
...
> OK, I'll do the paperwork. But did you start with my raw changes, or
Thanks.
So far I have applied no changes, but rather looked through
the patches Jonathan posted. From what he said, his modifications
were insubstantial, but I did not try to verify that.
> did you
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:44:59 -0400 (EDT), Jim Meyering wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> I'm not a lawyer, but I hereby grant to FSF all rights that they want or need
>> in order to include any of my code under the same license that parted
>> currently
>> uses. If you're worried about IBM, the cl
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:45:58 -0400 (EDT), Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello Jonathan and Stephen,
>>
>> First, thank for both of you.
>>
>> Stephen, from what I saw in your patch it will require copyright assignment
>> to FSF so while Jim and others with more experience in s3
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:45:58 -0400 (EDT), Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Jonathan and Stephen,
>
> First, thank for both of you.
>
> Stephen, from what I saw in your patch it will require copyright assignment
> to FSF so while Jim and others with more experience in s390 take a look on
> that, it
Hello Jonathan and Stephen,
First, thank for both of you.
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> > OK, I'll be happy to do that; but some guy named Jonathan Nieder
> > (jrnie...@gmail.com) apparently saw the Debian bug report and took
> > it upon him
forwarded 578097
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2010-04/msg00011.html
thanks
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Powell wrote:
> OK, I'll be happy to do that; but some guy named Jonathan Nieder
> (jrnie...@gmail.com) apparently saw the Debian bug report and took
> it upon himself to submit someth
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:38:25 -0400 (EDT), Otavio Salvador wrote:
> It would be much better if you could send them directly to the upstream
> mailing list since we will probably need FSF copyright assigment for this to
> get commited in the upstream repository. Besides that, they're in much
> better
Hello Stephen,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> ...
>
First I'd like to thank you by looking at it.
It would be much better if you could send them directly to the upstream
mailing list since we will probably need FSF copyright assigment for this to
get commited in the up
Package: parted
Version: 2.2-5
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: 447...@bugs.debian.org
Currently, parted has no support for CMS-formatted disks on the
s390 architecture, though this format *is* supported by the Linux
kernel. This bug report is a "wishlist" bug report (i.e. an
enhancement request)
13 matches
Mail list logo
