On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:27:00PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> I might be missing something though but as the code is not documented,
> this is a bit hard to tell ;).
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 02:54:21PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> It's up to you ;). Anyway, I think the LDAP modules does se
Hi Francesco,
> This is not grave, because it does not render the module unusable
> at all. Anyway, good catch, it needs to be better managed in
> mod_ldap.
It's up to you ;). Anyway, I think the LDAP modules does seem to require
some care because it's a bit messy and undocumen
severity 576705 important
forwarded 576705 bugs.proftpd.org
thanks
Forwarded as #3424
This is not grave, because it does not render the module unusable at all.
Anyway, good catch, it needs to be better managed in mod_ldap.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:27:00PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Packag
Package: proftpd-mod-ldap
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Hello,
When LDAPDoAuth specifies an invalid filter which leads to no results
being returned, mod_ldap SIGSEGV with the following backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7f073be4f6f0 (LWP 1625
4 matches
Mail list logo
