On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:27:00PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > I might be missing something though but as the code is not documented, > this is a bit hard to tell ;).
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 02:54:21PM +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > It's up to you ;). Anyway, I think the LDAP modules does seem to require > some care because it's a bit messy and undocumented, but maybe it's just > because the upstream author didn't have time to do so. Are you aware of > any plan of partial/complete rewrite of this bit? I can't speak for the Debian maintainer, but as upstream author of mod_ldap, I feel your comments would have been far more helpful if you stated what you felt was "messy" or "undocumented" about mod_ldap and perhaps what you felt could be done to improve the situation. Also, I feel that your comment that the code is "not documented" is incorrect. As with all ProFTPD configuration directives, mod_ldap directives are documented on the ProFTPD web site: http://proftpd.org/docs/directives/linked/config_ref_mod_ldap.html and in the ProFTPD source distribution. A number of sections in the mod_ldap source code contain comments when I felt they were important or required additional explanation. Without knowing in what specific ways you felt mod_ldap deficient, I can't offer any suggestions or implement any improvements. As stated in the README included with ProFTPD and mod_ldap (README.LDAP and README, respectively): -- If you're using mod_ldap successfully, are having problems getting mod_ldap up and running at your site, or have some code improvements or ideas for development, please let me know! -- In that spirit, I would appreciate any specific and constructive suggestions you have for improving mod_ldap. john -- John Morrissey _o /\ ---- __o j...@horde.net _-< \_ / \ ---- < \, www.horde.net/ __(_)/_(_)________/ \_______(_) /_(_)__ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
