On 24 January 2014 05:11, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
wrote:
> That's why I am not sure if it's better to leave this open or close
> it. Realistically, I don't think that this is going to be fixed,
Not immediately, but that is no reason to close it off. There is real
work that can be done her
2014-01-23 19:34 Axel Beckert:
Hi,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
I never noticed this as a problem in desktops or servers, even on
old pieces of hardware,
I agree.
but it might happen that with some architectures they struggle.
Even on my slowest boxes (Alix, Sparcs, PowerMac G4, c
Hi,
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> I never noticed this as a problem in desktops or servers, even on
> old pieces of hardware,
I agree.
> but it might happen that with some architectures they struggle.
Even on my slowest boxes (Alix, Sparcs, PowerMac G4, cheap VMs, ARM
netbook, DEC Alph
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi,
As Daniel Burrows said, this behaviour is not simple to change, and it
gets worse as package lists grow over time. Or maybe it will improve
over time with larger CPU caches and faster memories, but still. I
never noticed this as a problem in desktops or servers
4 matches
Mail list logo