Dear Ben,
>>> I know the scripts suck but I am not in a position to rewrite them. ...
>>> I fixed this in the svn branch ...
>>
>> You seem to be contradicting yourself.
>
> Not at all. ... I have made a localised fix ... I have removed ...
> I would like to go much further ...
OK, you seem to ma
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 09:12 +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> Dear Ben,
>
> > ... Sorry for the mistake.
>
> OK, you are only human and forgiven.
>
> > I know the scripts suck but I am not in a position to rewrite them. ...
> > I fixed this in the svn branch ...
>
> You seem to be contra
Dear Ben,
> ... Sorry for the mistake.
OK, you are only human and forgiven.
> I know the scripts suck but I am not in a position to rewrite them. ...
> I fixed this in the svn branch ...
You seem to be contradicting yourself.
> I asked you to send patches for linux-2.6, and you refused.
Huh?
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:27 +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> Dear Ben,
>
> You wrote:
>
> > The OP asked us to report the bug, so I assumed he didn't.
>
> Seems you did not pay attention to
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568317#86
> written a week before your cloning:
Dear Ben,
You wrote:
> The OP asked us to report the bug, so I assumed he didn't.
Seems you did not pay attention to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568317#86
written a week before your cloning:
>> Seeing your reluctance to "talk" to kernel-package, I now reported
>> Bug#568823
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 20:13 -0800, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a duplicate of Bug#568823, already reported by the OP,
> and already tagged pending. Secondly, none of these bugs actually exist
> in kernel-package anymore, since it no longer is using the ancient
> versions o
6 matches
Mail list logo
