On 1 February 2010 07:42, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> Nope, all the terms don't match: %s/libxul.so doesn't, and it's my
> fault (a change in xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1).
>
Well I'm not an expert =) just tried my best in triaging this.
> I'll add a check in xulrunner build to make sure dh_xulrunner still
>
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:29:44PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 1 February 2010 07:42, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >
> > Nope, all the terms don't match: %s/libxul.so doesn't, and it's my
> > fault (a change in xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1).
> >
>
> Well I'm not an expert =) just tried my best in triaging
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:02:58AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> reassign 567746 xulrunner-dev 1.9.1.6-1
> retitle 567746 "dh_xulrunner missed dependency in xiphos"
> thanks
>
> @David Thompson I believe it's a bug in dh_xulrunner cause it was
> suppose to generate dependencies. aptitude did ev
reassign 567746 xulrunner-dev 1.9.1.6-1
retitle 567746 "dh_xulrunner missed dependency in xiphos"
thanks
@David Thompson I believe it's a bug in dh_xulrunner cause it was
suppose to generate dependencies. aptitude did everything right.
Here we go. dh_xulrunner did not detect xulrunner dependency
4 matches
Mail list logo
