On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 12:02:58AM +0000, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > reassign 567746 xulrunner-dev 1.9.1.6-1 > retitle 567746 "dh_xulrunner missed dependency in xiphos" > thanks > > @David Thompson I believe it's a bug in dh_xulrunner cause it was > suppose to generate dependencies. aptitude did everything right. > > > Here we go. dh_xulrunner did not detect xulrunner dependency in xiphos > as you can see from all the current xiphos build-logs / binaries in > testing/unstable. > > Rebuilding locally also shows that xulrunner dependency is not added > to the substitute vars. > > I couldn't quite understand how dh_xulrunner works, but I can > successfully grep xiphos binary for all the terms dh_xulrunner is > looking for. So I'm puzzled as to why it didn't add the dependency.
Nope, all the terms don't match: %s/libxul.so doesn't, and it's my fault (a change in xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1). I'll add a check in xulrunner build to make sure dh_xulrunner still works with new versions. Thanks for spotting the problem. Mike PS: Note that before using dh_xulrunner, xiphos didn't have a xulrunner dependency, iirc, and therefore, wasn't working properly either ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
