"Thaddeus H. Black" wrote:
> I seem to remember that I once had a good reason to specify the
> build-dependencies Frank questions, but unfortunately I no longer
> remember the reason, nor do I remember much else, so let me say this:
> though no action is expected of Frank he can NMU with my thank
Incidentally, in the unlikely event that someone competent NMUs this
bug, would he, before uploading, try the build on stable lenny as well
as on sid? There is no good reason that the unmodified source should
not build its own backport.
--
Thaddeus
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reopen 566340
severity 566340 minor
stop
Michael Bienia reports an outdated TeX-related build-dependency in my
package 'derivations'. I thank him. The latest upload treats the bug
and closes the report.
However, Frank Kuester, who knows rather more about TeX packaging than I
do, further suspect
"Michael Bienia" wrote:
> derivations as a versioned build dependency (Build-Depends-Indep) on
> texlive-base-bin. As texlive-base-bin is now only provided by
> texlive-binaries, derivations' build dependency should be updated to
> texlive-binaries.
The TeX-related Build-deps of derivations don'
Package: derivations
Version: 0.51.20080419-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
derivations as a versioned build dependency (Build-Depends-Indep) on
texlive-base-bin. As texlive-base-bin is now only provided by
texlive-binaries, derivations' build dependency should be updated to
texlive-binaries.
Michael
5 matches
Mail list logo
