reopen 566340
severity 566340 minor
stop

Michael Bienia reports an outdated TeX-related build-dependency in my
package 'derivations'.  I thank him.  The latest upload treats the bug
and closes the report.

However, Frank Kuester, who knows rather more about TeX packaging than I
do, further suspects that 'derivations' suffers some unnecessary
build-dependencies.  I do not doubt that Frank is right, so let me
reopen the report now with reduced severity.

If that is all you want to know, then you can stop reading here.
Otherwise, further details follow.

I seem to remember that I once had a good reason to specify the
build-dependencies Frank questions, but unfortunately I no longer
remember the reason, nor do I remember much else, so let me say this:
though no action is expected of Frank he can NMU with my thanks should
he feel sufficiently motivated to do so.  Otherwise, well, time is hard
to find and my Internet connectivity is regrettably much worse than it
used to be; but probably, eventually, I will address the matter myself.

If the information is relevant to Frank or any other competent person
who might choose to NMU this bug before I do, the build-process
for 'derivations' exercises the LaTeX and postprocessing software pretty
hard.  This is not a typical LaTeX compilation and PDF presentation, but
a relatively complex processing train with a script or two hooked in and
even a special-purpose C++ program (compiled, run and then deleted as
part of the build) to interfere with and to specialize the build.  Maybe
this complexity has something to do with the unusual-seeming
build-dependencies, or maybe it does not: as I said, unfortunately I no
longer remember.

Since I do not know as much about TeX's internals as Frank undoubtedly
does, I admit to a certain superstition against disturbing a somewhat
complex build process which in fact is working right now in Sid.  TeX
though lovable is somewhat archaic, which can make it *feel*
unpredictable or brittle when driven hard.  I just do not understand the
TeX-packaging issues implicated.  For these reasons among others, I am
likely to defer the matter until after the release---though, as I said,
if Frank feels confident or does not care for my answer, and wants the
bug fixed, then he can NMU at his discretion now.

At the very least, whatever betide, I appreciate the good counsel on all
sides.  Let me know if further questions arise.

-- 
Thaddeus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to