On 16.03.2010 21:29, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:04:58AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/DeviceKit/DeviceKit-disks/commit/?id=9919bfe833f6f1070f643f8064fba421f62a471e
>
> Another instance of #545032. You have to provide more information, why
> calli
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:04:58AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/DeviceKit/DeviceKit-disks/commit/?id=9919bfe833f6f1070f643f8064fba421f62a471e
Another instance of #545032. You have to provide more information, why
calling the executables is not enough.
Bastian
--
...
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 07:39:10PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I guess only upstream can answer that sufficiently.
This is the first released version of the interface. The current intention is
to permit backwards-compatible extensions in subsequent upstream releases
without changing the version
Hi Bastian!
Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 08:37:30AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> +LVM2APP_ABINAME = 2.1
>
> Where does this value come from?
LVM2APP_ABINAME is just a variable name I picked, 2.1 comes from
the SOVERSION
$ objdump -x /usr/lib/liblvm2app.so | grep SONAME
SON
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 08:37:30AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> +LVM2APP_ABINAME = 2.1
Where does this value come from? How stable is this ABI?
Bastian
--
A Vulcan can no sooner be disloyal than he can exist without breathing.
-- Kirk, "The Menagerie", stardate 3012.4
--
To
Michael Biebl wrote:
> please find attached this patch. It does
>
> 2.) Add liblvm2app2.1.{install,symbols} and liblvm2app-dev.install
I have to add, that I deliberately decided to move liblvm2app.so.* to /usr/lib,
as I didn't see the necessity to keep in in /lib
Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it t
tags 564810 patch
thanks
Luca Bruno wrote:
>> Please consider building lvm2 with the --enable-applib configure
>> switch and packaging the resulting lvm2app library files.
>
> I'd join this request, as I'm personally interested in it and gparted
> could benefit of this too, soon.
> Please enable
> Please consider building lvm2 with the --enable-applib configure
> switch and packaging the resulting lvm2app library files.
I'd join this request, as I'm personally interested in it and gparted
could benefit of this too, soon.
Please enable it, or let us know if you need additional manpower fo
Package: lvm2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
the next release of DeviceKit-disk (i.e. udisks) will implement support
for LVM2 [1]. It uses the lvm2app library for this.
Please consider building lvm2 with the --enable-applib configure switch
and packaging the resulting lvm2app library files.
Thanks,
Mich
9 matches
Mail list logo
