Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2012-05-01 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-05-01 12:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Ok, I have uploaded bogl 0.1.18-7 after checking that things upgrade > as wanted. There is however apparently a discrepancy between the > bogl-provided bterm and the ncurses-provided bterm (I assumed that they > were the same, but they are not),

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2012-05-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sven Joachim, le Tue 01 May 2012 11:04:38 +0200, a écrit : > On 2012-04-30 00:35 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Sven Joachim, le Sat 28 Apr 2012 14:49:52 +0200, a écrit : > > > >> Thanks, I've seen that you have applied my change. I intend to upload > >> ncurses 5.9-7 soon. Since ncurses-t

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2012-05-01 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-04-30 00:35 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Sven Joachim, le Sat 28 Apr 2012 14:49:52 +0200, a écrit : > >> Thanks, I've seen that you have applied my change. I intend to upload >> ncurses 5.9-7 soon. Since ncurses-term 5.9-7 will not be co-installable >> with bogl-bterm <= 0.1.18-6, a

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2012-04-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sven Joachim, le Sat 28 Apr 2012 14:49:52 +0200, a écrit : > On 2012-04-25 02:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Sven Joachim, le Fri 20 Apr 2012 20:51:09 +0200, a écrit : > >> Samuel, do you think that is a good plan? > > > > Looks so indeed. > > Thanks, I've seen that you have applied my chang

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2012-04-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-04-25 02:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Sven Joachim, le Fri 20 Apr 2012 20:51:09 +0200, a écrit : >> Samuel, do you think that is a good plan? > > Looks so indeed. Thanks, I've seen that you have applied my change. I intend to upload ncurses 5.9-7 soon. Since ncurses-term 5.9-7 wi

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2012-04-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sven Joachim, le Fri 20 Apr 2012 20:51:09 +0200, a écrit : > Samuel, do you think that is a good plan? Looks so indeed. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2012-04-20 Thread Sven Joachim
This is about an old request to include the bterm terminfo entry in ncurses-base or ncurses-term. I don't think the former makes much sense, but the latter would be possible. It requires coordinated uploads of ncurses and bogl, though. On 2010-06-22 20:43 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-06

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2010-06-22 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-06-22 17:36 +0200, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:36:05PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: >> On 2010-06-22 13:08 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: >> > On 2009-12-23 02:54 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote: >> >> Please include the terminfo entry for bterm, preferably in ncurses-base, >> >

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2010-06-22 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-06-22 17:22 +0200, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 01:08:06PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: >> Sorry for not replying sooner, I did not get around to actually testing >> the Debian installer. >> >> On 2009-12-23 02:54 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote: >> >> > Package: ncurses-base

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2010-06-22 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:36:05PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-06-22 13:08 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > On 2009-12-23 02:54 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote: > >> Please include the terminfo entry for bterm, preferably in ncurses-base, > >> but if not there then in ncurses-term. > > > > Taking

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2010-06-22 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 01:08:06PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > Sorry for not replying sooner, I did not get around to actually testing > the Debian installer. > > On 2009-12-23 02:54 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > Package: ncurses-base > > Version: 5.7+20090803-2 > > Severity: normal > > > >

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2010-06-22 Thread Sven Joachim
severity 562134 wishlist thanks On 2010-06-22 13:08 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2009-12-23 02:54 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote: > >> Package: ncurses-base >> Version: 5.7+20090803-2 >> Severity: normal >> >> The Debian installer uses bogl-bterm on the primary terminal, which uses >> TERM=bterm.

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2010-06-22 Thread Sven Joachim
Sorry for not replying sooner, I did not get around to actually testing the Debian installer. On 2009-12-23 02:54 +0100, Josh Triplett wrote: > Package: ncurses-base > Version: 5.7+20090803-2 > Severity: normal > > The Debian installer uses bogl-bterm on the primary terminal, which uses > TERM=bt

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2009-12-22 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, Josh Triplett wrote: Package: ncurses-base Version: 5.7+20090803-2 Severity: normal The Debian installer uses bogl-bterm on the primary terminal, which uses TERM=bterm. Neither ncurses-base nor ncurses-term knows about this hmm - I do see bterm.ti in that package (it con

Bug#562134: ncurses-base: Please include terminfo entry for bterm

2009-12-22 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: ncurses-base Version: 5.7+20090803-2 Severity: normal The Debian installer uses bogl-bterm on the primary terminal, which uses TERM=bterm. Neither ncurses-base nor ncurses-term knows about this terminal type, so all screen-oriented programs fail to run. This affects the ability to run s