Bug#553621: closed by Niels Thykier (Re: Bug#553621: lintian: add javascript to the usual interpreters)

2011-08-16 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2011-08-16 00:13, Jérémy Lal wrote: Jeremy Lal wrote: I know javascript is, for now, not a usual interpreter, but with spidermonkey and libv8's node.js server, it's certainly growing to be more common. I guess /usr/bin/javascript is a reasonnable name for the interpret

Bug#553621: closed by Niels Thykier (Re: Bug#553621: lintian: add javascript to the usual interpreters)

2011-08-15 Thread Jérémy Lal
>>> Jeremy Lal wrote: >>> I know javascript is, for now, not a usual interpreter, but with >>> spidermonkey and libv8's node.js server, it's certainly growing to be >>> more common. I guess /usr/bin/javascript is a reasonnable name for the >>> interpreter, though for now no package provides it.

Bug#553621: lintian: add javascript to the usual interpreters

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Jeremy Lal writes: > I know javascript is, for now, not a usual interpreter, but with > spidermonkey and libv8's node.js server, it's certainly growing to be > more common. I guess /usr/bin/javascript is a reasonnable name for the > interpreter, though for now no package provides it. I don't re

Bug#553621: lintian: add javascript to the usual interpreters

2009-11-01 Thread Jeremy Lal
Package: lintian Version: 2.2.17 Severity: wishlist I know javascript is, for now, not a usual interpreter, but with spidermonkey and libv8's node.js server, it's certainly growing to be more common. I guess /usr/bin/javascript is a reasonnable name for the interpreter, though for now no package p