On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 04:24:28PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> The current packages are all named gforge although, starting from testing,
> they are based on the renamed codebase available from fusionforge.org.
>
> I think the binary packages should be renamed fusionforge*, eventually
> pr
reassign 551761 fusionforge
thanks
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 04:24:28PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> I think the binary packages should be renamed fusionforge*, eventually
> provinding the corresponding gforge packages as aliases.
>
Since upload of fusionforge source package, this is more a
Package: gforge
Severity: normal
Hi.
The current packages are all named gforge although, starting from testing, they
are based on the renamed codebase available from fusionforge.org.
I think the binary packages should be renamed fusionforge*, eventually
provinding the corresponding gforge pack
3 matches
Mail list logo