Package: gforge
Severity: normal

Hi.

The current packages are all named gforge although, starting from testing, they 
are based on the renamed codebase available from fusionforge.org.

I think the binary packages should be renamed fusionforge*, eventually 
provinding the corresponding gforge packages as aliases.

Thanks in advance.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages gforge depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.27     Debian configuration management sy
pn  gforge-common                 <none>     (no description available)
pn  gforge-db-postgresql          <none>     (no description available)
pn  gforge-ftp-proftpd            <none>     (no description available)
pn  gforge-lists-mailman          <none>     (no description available)
pn  gforge-mta-exim4 | gforge-mta <none>     (no description available)
pn  gforge-shell-postgresql | gfo <none>     (no description available)
pn  gforge-web-apache             <none>     (no description available)

Versions of packages gforge recommends:
pn  gforge-plugin-scmsvn | gforge <none>     (no description available)

gforge suggests no packages.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to