Hi Nicholas,
Please do so.
There's not much to discuss. Services start following an order that fits
most of the users. But not all. In those cases, humans are required to
make changes to the system in order to suit their needs.
It seems that maraDNS needs to start after Openvpn if it wishes to u
Alberto,
I'm happy to take the bug report back.
However I think there is something to discuss. Surely this problem
is between the the DNS protocol, the boot sequence and the VPN rather
than any particular implementation of any of the three.
I wonder if you have had this issue with
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 11:15:09PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > reassign 551359 openvpn
> Bug #551359 [maradns] maradns: Maradns starts before openvpn, failed to start
> if binding to openvpn ifc
> Bug reassigned from package 'm
3 matches
Mail list logo
