I just NMUed a number of packages with build-dependencies on
libjpeg62-dev, which should get us closer to a full move to libjpeg8 for
wheezy. These packages are in DELAYED/7:
- aaphoto
- ctwm
- driftnet
- exrtools
- flam3
- gegl
- gpicview
- italc
- jp2a
- jpegpixi
- libwebp
- minidlna
- mrxvt
-
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 08:33:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 15:47:27 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > There still remain 15 packages dependending on libjpeg62-dev, however I am
> > not sure it
> > is worth delaying the transition more. Maybe I should just upload th
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 15:47:27 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> There still remain 15 packages dependending on libjpeg62-dev, however I am
> not sure it
> is worth delaying the transition more. Maybe I should just upload the new
> packages.
>
Yes, I think so. The remaining packages can be NMUe
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:43:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:13:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > Given the large legacy of libjpeg62, it is probably safer to keep it.
> > Also having libjpeg62-dev an alias for libjpeg8-dev is going to be
> > confusing. I will r
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 22:27:59 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:13:53PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Either way we should probably get this started at this point, so please
> > feel free to upload at your convenience.
>
> Fine. How should I proceed ? Should I upload
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:43:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:13:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > Given the large legacy of libjpeg62, it is probably safer to keep it.
> > Also having libjpeg62-dev an alias for libjpeg8-dev is going to be
> > confusing. I will r
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:13:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Given the large legacy of libjpeg62, it is probably safer to keep it.
> Also having libjpeg62-dev an alias for libjpeg8-dev is going to be
> confusing. I will report bug to packages that Depends on libjpeg62-dev
> as a first step.
>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:38:37PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 16:29:17 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > One issue with this transition is that a number of packages still depends
> > on
> > libjpeg62-dev
Hi Bill,
sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 16:29:17 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> One issue with this transition is that a number of packages still depends on
> libjpeg62-dev instead of libjpeg-dev. This might cause packages to have
> uninstallable
> build-de
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:13:53PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > They'll still need to be fixed when we make the switch, since some of
> > them are libraries with a non-trivial number of reverse dependencies.
> > Of course one option could be to make them build-depend on
> > libjpeg62-dev, but i
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:13:08 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Hi Bill,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 18:08:21 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > >
> >
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 13:53:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:13:08 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Hi Bill,
> > >
> > > #547393 is marked as blocked by a number of other bugs. Can you check
>
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:13:08 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 18:08:21 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >
> > > Dear release team,
> > >
> > > I would like to proceed with the libjpeg8 t
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 03:33:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 18:08:21 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> > Dear release team,
> >
> > I would like to proceed with the libjpeg8 transition. What are your plan ?
> >
> #547393 is marked as blocked by a number
Hi Bill,
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 18:08:21 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I would like to proceed with the libjpeg8 transition. What are your plan ?
>
#547393 is marked as blocked by a number of other bugs. Can you check
with the maintainers of the affected packages?
Che
15 matches
Mail list logo
