On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:43:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:13:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Given the large legacy of libjpeg62, it is probably safer to keep it. > > Also having libjpeg62-dev an alias for libjpeg8-dev is going to be > > confusing. I will report bug to packages that Depends on libjpeg62-dev > > as a first step. > > > Alright, thank you.
Done, 18 bugs reported, #629960 to #629978 minus #629971. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
