On Aug 21, Kees Cook wrote:
> Given that there is a (slowly evolving) set of logic built into
> hardening-wrapper that detects which features are available for a given
> architecture, it seems like this would be a case of inappropriate
> cut/paste coding.
It his unfortunate that doorstop architec
On Aug 21, Kees Cook wrote:
> Since xinetd listens on external ports, I think it might benefit
> from having hardening[1] enabled for its build. The attached patch
> implements this.
Please provide a patch which does not rely on hardening-wrapper.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Di
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:16:19AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Please provide a patch which does not rely on hardening-wrapper.
Given that there is a (slowly evolving) set of logic built into
hardening-wrapper that detects which features are available for a given
architecture, it seems like this
Package: openbsd-inetd
Version: 0.20080125-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic ubuntu-patch
Hello!
Since xinetd listens on external ports, I think it might benefit
from having hardening[1] enabled for its build. The attached patch
imp
4 matches
Mail list logo
