On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:41:20PM +0930, Ron wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:31:57PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:33:19AM +0930, Ron wrote:
> > > Robert, do you know anything about licence trouble in gcc 4.4?
> > > Apparently there is some GPLv3 taint in there now
Robert Millan writes:
>> Robert, do you know anything about licence trouble in gcc 4.4?
>> Apparently there is some GPLv3 taint in there now which may make
>> trouble for GPLv2 apps and maybe others, but I haven't heard
>> anything yet on if/how this will be resolved ...
>
> I don't think there's
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 01:31:57PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:33:19AM +0930, Ron wrote:
> > Robert, do you know anything about licence trouble in gcc 4.4?
> > Apparently there is some GPLv3 taint in there now which may make
> > trouble for GPLv2 apps and maybe others,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:33:19AM +0930, Ron wrote:
>
> When dwarf is Ready, we should probably switch to it, but until it
> is, we should probably sit tight on sjlj.
Ok, we'll wait then.
> Robert, do you know anything about licence trouble in gcc 4.4?
> Apparently there is some GPLv3 taint in
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:05:50PM +0200, Tomasz Gajewski wrote:
> Robert Millan writes:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:22:48AM +0200, Tomasz Gajewski wrote:
> >> * dwarf exception handling model - working also when thrown through dll
> >>boundaries
> >
> > I believe you can't provide dwar
Robert Millan writes:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:22:48AM +0200, Tomasz Gajewski wrote:
>> * dwarf exception handling model - working also when thrown through dll
>>boundaries
>
> I believe you can't provide dwarf and sjlj at the same time, and
> also it breaks ABI compatibility.
I know it
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:22:48AM +0200, Tomasz Gajewski wrote:
> * dwarf exception handling model - working also when thrown through dll
>boundaries
I believe you can't provide dwarf and sjlj at the same time, and also it breaks
ABI compatibility.
Nevertheless, if you've tested this in you
7 matches
Mail list logo