Bug#534058: FTBFS on amd64

2017-05-02 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 05:05:14PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > That sentence has been there forever (e.g. it's in > https://release.debian.org/etch/rc_policy.txt) and has never been > applied to arch:all. Julien, that's simply not true. We have been consistently treating FTBFS bugs in the Arc

Bug#534058: FTBFS on amd64

2017-05-01 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 05:05:14PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > They're both blocked They are not blocked at all. Nothing prevent us from using and "Arch:" field with all the supported architectures, and in fact, that was the plan from one of the maintainers: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#534058: FTBFS on amd64

2017-05-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 15:22:40 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 02:43:11PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 13:41:03 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > > What about just release policy when it says "packages must autobuild from > > > source"? > > >

Bug#534058: FTBFS on amd64

2017-05-01 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 02:43:11PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 13:41:03 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > What about just release policy when it says "packages must autobuild from > > source"? > > Does such statement suddenly not refer to our official autobuilders? > >

Bug#534058: FTBFS on amd64

2017-05-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 13:41:03 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 01:29:11PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Control: severity -1 normal > > > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 13:12:32 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > > retitle 534058 FTBFS on amd64 > > > severity 534058 seriou

Bug#534058: FTBFS on amd64

2017-05-01 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 01:29:11PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: severity -1 normal > > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 13:12:32 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > retitle 534058 FTBFS on amd64 > > severity 534058 serious > > thanks > > > > Packages must autobuild in our autobuilders. Because o

Bug#534058: FTBFS on amd64

2017-05-01 Thread Julien Cristau
Control: severity -1 normal On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 13:12:32 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > retitle 534058 FTBFS on amd64 > severity 534058 serious > thanks > > Packages must autobuild in our autobuilders. Because our Arch:all > autobuilder is amd64, this is RC. > No, it very much isn't. Cheers

Bug#534058: FTBFS on amd64

2017-05-01 Thread Santiago Vila
unblock 534058 by 456037 retitle 534058 pixbros: FTBFS on amd64: build-depends not available thanks While fixing Bug #456037 would be a way to fix this bug, it is certainly not the only possible way. Thanks.

Bug#534058: FTBFS on amd64

2017-05-01 Thread Santiago Vila
retitle 534058 FTBFS on amd64 severity 534058 serious thanks Packages must autobuild in our autobuilders. Because our Arch:all autobuilder is amd64, this is RC. Moreover, being able to upload every package in source-only form is a release goal (see Bug #830997 for details, it may not be the lette