On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:09:30PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:30:47PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:48:23PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >
> > > I would not really love the tag within warning, cos it is really
> > > something that should
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:30:47PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:48:23PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> > I would not really love the tag within warning, cos it is really
> > something that shouldn't occur, so a special case for
> > this one thing, with all the stuff said i
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:48:23PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> I would not really love the tag within warning, cos it is really
> something that shouldn't occur, so a special case for
> this one thing, with all the stuff said in the bugreport, in lintian
> would be what I prefer (besides changin
On 11918 March 1977, Niko Tyni wrote:
> but the no-copyright-file one is a bit controversial. I put the
> current lintian override in place after the discussion in #522827;
> quoting briefly:
>> > I'd recommend against anyone doing the same thing in a new package, but
>> > given that it already i
Hi FTP master team,
many thanks for your work on the lintian based autorejects.
I see the perl package is on the list of to-be-rejected packages
for two reasons:
perl-suid: missing-dependency-on-libc
perl: no-copyright-file
The first is an i386-only bug (#552797) that will be fixed, but the
no-
5 matches
Mail list logo
