On 11918 March 1977, Niko Tyni wrote:
> but the no-copyright-file one is a bit controversial. I put the
> current lintian override in place after the discussion in #522827;
> quoting briefly:
>> > I'd recommend against anyone doing the same thing in a new package, but
>> > given that it already is like this, I never managed to convince myself
>> > that the effort to change it was really worth it.
> Please see the bug log for the full discussion.
Read.
> Would you be OK with either moving the tag into the 'warning' category
> or having a special case for the perl package in lintian ?
I would not really love the tag within warning, cos it is really
something that shouldn't occur, so a special case for
this one thing, with all the stuff said in the bugreport, in lintian
would be what I prefer (besides changing the package).
Should it happen that you want/need to upload perl before the next(i
hope :) ) lintian version with such a thing included, come talk to us
and we manage to get your package through.
--
bye, Joerg
<liw> HE, we had sex in Debian for many years, yes, before I put a stop
to it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
